The bill is missing the money. We need to see how the money is spent. The money for the 'emergency sustainable budgets' needs to be accounted. Yes, every dollar and all the work done. This is more important as the 'emergencies' were five year budgets and are going on their second five years. Fifty billion dollars over five years is allot of money. The budgets are also seen as entitlements and debt for America. They were also doubled and tripled by Congress, putting us in a huge debt over a long period of time. We also need to account for Americans in these budgets. For example, is the money going to the budget from another agency farming out it's workers to the program? Why isn't the money going to NGOs instead of government agencies who are transferring budgets? Are these NGOs American? How many Americans are hired for the budgets?
posted by Roland, July 31, 2008This bill is a great start. I also want to include some money issues in the bill. For example, I've always wanted a specific"who benefits" section added to committee and conference reports that was more explicit than the current CBO economic analysis --i.e. how many folks are benefited, where they are located, and whether folks needed any special pre-existing requirements or attributes to benefit from a piece of legislation. This kind of provision would be helpful in understanding the true impact of legislation and flushing out special interest provisions that aid few people.
posted by Ruth Fleischer, Adjunct Professor, University of, August 1, 2008I like the idea of going directly to a country source for legislation feedback, but that usually goes through a government employee and they end up justifying things like five year budgets. I think I've defined 'Operations Research.' The decided to justify the PEPFAR/Global AIDs the second five years of the 'sustainable emergency budgets.' They had to be asked allot. http://blogs.cgdev.org/globalhealth/2...
posted by Roland, August 8, 2008One of the ways we get taken is in Government Specifications. We need to have a control over Specifications, example while I was in the Army a contract came open for butchers aprons. The reasonable specifications would be unbleached cotton duck material with neck loop and strap tie at waist. there then would have been three bidders and the lowest bid would have been chosen. But there was an added specification that the aprons be sewn with orange thread! This had nothing to do with the servicability of the apron, it just made sure that the RIGHT company got the contract at the highest price. Specifications should only relate to the servicability of the item only uniforms or the like should have color spefications. Unless there is a special need items like (silk labels) should not be allowed in specifications.
posted by Msg John Wirts, U.S.A. Ret, August 17, 2008Regulation of financial markets must be transparent to everybody. Government must call for help from everybody who can help. I have told my federal legislators (Larry Craig, Mike Crapo, and Mike Simpson) to do this. We all must tell our federal legislators to do this.
posted by Calvin Leman (Candidate Idaho Representative), September 24, 2008I believe that transparency in the investment bank and hedge funds clientele list would answer many questions. The trillion dollar a year market in illegal drugs is laundered through these institutions, also illegal weapon trade, terrorists and others.
posted by Vicki V., September 27, 2008We should be able to find any information on each Congress person relevant to their role as Senator or Representative. For example, their expenditures for meetings and travel, meals, sources of income, etc. We should also be able to see how the $700M bailout is being spent...a spreadsheet of who is getting any money and what amount.
posted by Anonymous, November 5, 2008